SRSEC Reporting Desk

Pay versus performance: disclosure examples

Note: Item 402(v) pay-versus-performance disclosure (typically in the proxy statement).

Compare side by side →

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP /NEW (COST) · Form DEF 14A for period ended 2025-08-31 · filed 2025-12-04 · Section: PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE

As required by Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, this section describes the relationship between compensation actually paid and certain financial performance measures of the Company. For information about the philosophy, objectives and criteria of executive pay as they pertain to the Company's performance, refer to the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section.

YearSummary Compensation Table Total for PEO($) 1Summary Compensation Table Total for Former PEO($) 1Compensation Actually Paid to PEO($) 1,2Compensation Actually Paid to Former PEO($) 1,2Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs($) 1Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs($) 1,2Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based On:Net Income($) 5 (in millions)Net Sales Adjusted for Changes in Foreign Currencies ($) 6 (in millions)
TSR($) 3Peer Group TSR($) 4
202513,932,597—15,633,675—6,250,4316,854,360293.59173.488,099271,855
202412,229,74116,049,87018,702,31929,445,3708,381,97811,133,897276.32154.787,367250,099
2023—16,870,623—18,733,7736,304,7156,926,922163.78129.006,292241,194
2022—9,905,070—11,868,8755,806,0236,353,825158.84128.265,844224,492
2021—8,804,752—10,342,1084,724,7765,794,960133.65184.845,007189,293
Verbatim excerpt (183 words), formatting simplified. View full filing on EDGAR →
Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT) · Form DEF 14A for period ended 2026-06-12 · filed 2026-04-29 · Section: Pay Versus Performance

The following table provides information required under Item 402(v) of Regulation S -K disclosing (i) a measure of total compensation and a measure reflecting “compensation actually paid” for our principal executive officer (our “PEO”) and, as an average, for our other named executive officers (“NEOs”), and (ii) select financial performance measures, in each case, for our five most recently completed fiscal years. The Human Resources Committee did not consider the pay versus performance disclosure below in making its pay decisions for any of the years shown. The amounts shown for Compensation Actually Paid have been calculated in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S -K and do not reflect compensation actually earned, realized or received by our NEOs; these amounts reflect the Summary Compensation Table totals with certain adjustments as described in the following table and footnotes.

YearSummary Compensation Table Total for PEO ($)Compensation Actually Paid to PEO ($)Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs ($)Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs ($)Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based On:Net Income ($)Company Selected Measure: Revenue ($)
Total Stockholder Return ($)Peer Group Total Stockholder Return ($)
(a)(b) (1)(c) (2)(5)(d) (3)(e) (4)(5)(f) (6)(g) (7)(h) (8)(i) (9)
202511,458,0391,145,1135,674,275( 1,396,923267.28258.441,853,442,6856,799,612,384
202413,143,28937,716,9375,967,14615,033,124442.49301.441,745,218,8205,955,845,824
202316,301,61321,526,9186,586,8738,065,655274.12221.061,147,780,4995,304,835,490
202214,200,453( 15,190,0854,532,172( 4,867,322228.97132.79857,302,0794,417,356,061
202114,203,21184,745,1904,867,61627,685,473336.64206.76606,792,0113,342,217,533

________________________

(1) The dollar amounts reported in column (b) are the amounts of total compensation reported for our PEO for each corresponding year in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table. Our PEO for fiscal years 2025, 2024, 2023, 2022 and 2021 was Ken Xie .

(2) The dollar amounts reported in column (c) represent the amount of “compensation actually paid” (which is sometimes referred to as the “CAP”) for our PEO for the corresponding fiscal year, as calculated in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S -K and as further described below.

Verbatim excerpt (353 words), formatting simplified. View full filing on EDGAR →
STRYKER CORP (SYK) · Form DEF 14A for period ended 2026-05-06 · filed 2026-03-23
Average Summary Compensation Table Total for non-PEO NEOs ($)Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based on:
YearSummary Compensation Table Total for PEO ($)Compensation Actually Paid to PEO ($)Average Compensation Actually Paid to non-PEO NEOs ($)Total Shareholder Return ($)Peer Group Total Shareholder Return ($)Net Income (in $ millions)Reported Net Sales Growth (%)
202521,401,49524,776,4774,638,2695,450,024151.03148.363,24611.2
202421,979,36948,190,1726,361,98512,965,592153.30129.462,99310.2
202320,767,84742,471,9516,072,17911,389,954126.33126.213,16511.1
202218,563,21411,419,3465,246,4893,676,892102.05123.672,3587.8
202116,359,89827,844,5025,769,0748,859,654110.22126.131,99419.2

Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO: This column represents the total compensation value for our PEO as reported in the

Summary Compensation Table. Mr. Lobo was the PEO for each of the covered years in the table.

Compensation Actually Paid to PEO: This column represents the compensation actually paid value for our PEO calculated according

to the methodology prescribed by the SEC. The following table summarizes the adjustments to the Summary Compensation Table value

which resulted in the compensation actually paid amount for our PEO in 2025:

Verbatim excerpt (191 words), formatting simplified. View full filing on EDGAR →
Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) · Form DEF 14A for period ended 2026-06-05 · filed 2026-04-24 · Section: Table of Contents
Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based on:
YearSummary Compensation Table Total for CEO ($)(1)Compensation Actually Paid to CEO ($)(2)(3)Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-CEO NEOs ($)(1)Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-CEO NEOs ($)(2)Company Total Shareholder Return ($)(4)Peer Group Total Shareholder Return ($)(4)Net Income (Loss) (Thousands) ($)Company Selected Measure: Stock Price Measure ($)(5)
2025242,122( 89,229,87810,296,26510,492,44192.45258.382,511,277124.51
2024186,3265,310,32614,905,31911,463,64289.52208.302,648,349135.23
2023295,125303,463,1259,721,16819,646,56892.74152.484,791,795128.87
2022311,233( 585,324,7679,484,778( 20,027,75858.2496.601,893,105100.59
2021132,152301,440,1529,419,94619,647,185113.41134.53( 352,034176.69
(1)Amounts reported in these columns represent the total compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table for our CEO during each applicable fiscal year and the average of the total compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table for our remaining NEOs for the relevant fiscal year, which captures the individuals indicated in the table below for each fiscal year:
Verbatim excerpt (172 words), formatting simplified. View full filing on EDGAR →
Datadog, Inc. (DDOG) · Form DEF 14A for period ended 2026-06-15 · filed 2026-04-29 · Section: PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE

As required by Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship between the compensation actually paid to our Chief Executive Officer and our other named executive officers and certain aspects of our financial performance. Compensation actually paid was calculated for purposes of this disclosure in accordance with the applicable SEC rules and does not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid to our Chief Executive Officer or our other named executive officers during the applicable years. The compensation committee does not use compensation actually paid as a basis for making compensation decisions. For information concerning how and why our compensation committee arrived at specific compensation decisions for 2025, please refer to “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

Summary Compensation Table Total for CEO ($) (1)Compensation Actually Paid to CEO ($) (2)Average Summary Compensation Table Total for non-CEO NEOs ($) (3)Average Compensation Actually Paid to non-CEO NEOs ($) (4)Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based On:Net Income (Loss) ($ Millions) (7)Revenue ($ Millions) (8)
YearTotal Shareholder Return (5)Peer Group Total Shareholder Return (6)
202527,055,48250,088,03715,628,42927,836,881360388107.703,427
202419,842,55429,463,76916,774,71523,980,392378301183.752,684
202311,644,93433,077,63510,196,71325,279,01232122148.572,128
202211,249,243( 85,747,704 )11,665,984( 32,708,200 )195133( 50.16 )1,675
20218,632,636107,014,42910,849,30860,711,468471207( 20.75 )1,029

(1) Represents the total compensation reported for Mr. Pomel for each applicable year in the “Summary Compensation Table”.

(2) The following adjustments were made to Mr. Pomel’s total compensation for each applicable year to determine the compensation actually paid:

Verbatim excerpt (282 words), formatting simplified. View full filing on EDGAR →
CARVANA CO. (CVNA) · Form DEF 14A for period ended 2025-12-31 · filed 2026-03-25 · Section: PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE

As required by Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship between executive compensation actually paid and certain financial performance of the Company. As described in greater detail in “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” our executive compensation program reflects a variable pay-for-performance philosophy. We use grants of time-based RSUs, and have previously used stock

options to incentivize our NEOs to increase the value of our enterprise for our stockholders. We have further previously used PSUs to tie executive incentives to key metrics in the Company's operating plan and future success. For further information concerning the Company’s variable pay-for-performance philosophy and how the Company’s philosophy aligns executive compensation with the Company’s performance, refer to “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

YearSummary Compensation Table Total for CEO (1)Compensation Actually Paid to CEO (2)Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-CEO NEOs (3)Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-CEO NEOs (4)Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based On:Net Income (in millions) (7)Adjusted EBITDA (8)
Company Total Shareholder Return (5)Peer Group Total Shareholder Return (6)
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)(i)
20258,382,555110,136,0057,372,98794,899,087176.18150.081,8952,237
202410,595,400118,068,0799,291,363103,567,57584.90148.714041,378
20236,454,66138,123,0225,694,36032,914,70222.10109.75150339
20225,594,436( 10,103,013 )5,017,181( 8,193,813 )1.9877.70( 2,894 )( 1,041 )
20215,050,3455,302,9814,426,6545,423,45896.76118.97( 287 )64

(1) Mr. Garcia was our Chief Executive Officer in all years presented. The dollar amounts reported in column (b) are the amounts of total compensation reported for Mr. Garcia for each corresponding year in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table (the “SCT”). Refer to “Executive Compensation – Executive Compensation Tables – Summary Compensation Table.”

Verbatim excerpt (320 words), formatting simplified. View full filing on EDGAR →
W.W. GRAINGER, INC. (GWW) · Form DEF 14A for period ended 2026-04-29 · filed 2026-03-10 · Section: Pay Versus Performance

In accordance with rules adopted by the SEC pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010, we provide the following disclosure regarding executive compensation for our principal executive officer (“PEO”) and our other NEOs (“Non-PEO NEOs”) and Company performance for the fiscal years listed below. While we are required to identify total Company adjusted ROIC as the Company Selected Measure (“CSM”) in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K of the Exchange Act, adjusted ROIC and daily sales growth are the financial measures we consider the two most important in linking performance to compensation actually paid to the NEOs for the 2025 fiscal year to Company performance, as the Company’s overall NEO compensation structure is designed to drive profitable growth leading to shareholder value creation.

​Year​​​Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO (1)​​​Compensation Actually Paid to PEO (1)(2)(3)​​​Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs (1)​​​Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs (1)(2)(3)​​​Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based On:​​​Net Income ($MM)​​​Adjusted ROIC (5)​​​Daily, Organic Constant Currency Sales Growth (5)​
​TSR​​​Peer Group TSR (4)​​​CSM​​​Supplemental Measure​
​2025​​​​​$ 11,609,508​​​​​​$ 9,107,336​​​​​​$ 3,949,001​​​​​​$ 3,497,275​​​​​​$ 261​​​​​​$ 231​​​​​​$ 1,706​​​​​​39.1 %​​​​​​4.0 %​​
​2024​​​​​$ 10,881,689​​​​​​$ 15,759,913​​​​​​$ 3,053,409​​​​​​$ 4,239,678​​​​​​$ 270​​​​​​$ 208​​​​​​$ 1,909​​​​​​41.4 %​​​​​​4.5 %​​
​2023​​​​​$ 10,160,673​​​​​​$ 23,002,860​​​​​​$ 3,042,195​​​​​​$ 4,822,536​​​​​​$ 211​​​​​​$ 179​​​​​​$ 1,829​​​​​​42.8 %​​​​​​9.2 %​​
​2022​​​​​$ 9,967,658​​​​​​$ 14,293,346​​​​​​$ 3,121,115​​​​​​$ 3,736,729​​​​​​$ 140​​​​​​$ 121​​​​​​$ 1,547​​​​​​40.6 %​​​​​​16.5 %​​
​2021​​​​​$ 9,015,594​​​​​​$ 16,301,335​​​​​​$ 2,138,920​​​​​​$ 2,891,203​​​​​​$ 129​​​​​​$ 137​​​​​​$ 1,043​​​​​​31.9 %​​​​​​12.8 %​​
Verbatim excerpt (596 words), formatting simplified. View full filing on EDGAR →
Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) · Form DEF 14A for period ended 2026-06-04 · filed 2026-04-23 · Section: Pay Versus Performance

As required by Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K (the “PVP Rules”), we are providing information about the relationship between our Company performance and executive compensation actually paid to our Principal Executive Officer (our “PEO”) and the other NEOs (the “Reported NEOs”), as calculated in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. For further information concerning our pay-for-performance philosophy and how we align executive compensation with our performance, see our Compensation Discussion and Analysis in this Proxy Statement.

In the below pay versus performance table, we provide information about compensation of our NEOs for each of the last two fiscal years (the “Covered Years”). Additionally, we provide information about the results for certain financial performance measures during the Covered Years. Although the PVP Rules require us to disclose “compensation actually paid” (“CAP”), these amounts do not necessarily reflect compensation that our NEOs actually earned in the Covered Years. Instead, “compensation actually paid” reflects a calculation computed in accordance with the PVP Rules, including adjustments to the values of unvested and vested equity awards during the Covered Years based on either year-end or vesting date stock prices and various accounting valuation assumptions. “Compensation actually paid” generally fluctuates due to stock price performance.

Verbatim excerpt (213 words), formatting simplified. View full filing on EDGAR →
COHERENT CORP. (COHR) · Form DEF 14A for period ended 2026-11-18 · filed 2026-10-09 · Section: PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE

In accordance with rules adopted by the SEC pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, we provide the following disclosure regarding executive compensation for our principal executive officers (“PEOs”) and Non-PEO NEOs and Company performance for the fiscal years listed below. Compensation actually paid, as determined under SEC requirements, does not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid to our executive officers during a covered year. For information regarding the Company’s pay for performance philosophy and how the Company aligns executive compensation with the Company’s performance, refer to the CD&A.

​Year​​Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO 1 1 ($)​​Compensation Actually Paid to PEO 1 1,2,3 ($)​​Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs 1 ($)​​Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs 1,2,3 ($)​​Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment based on: 4​​Net Income ($ Millions)​​Adjusted EBITDA 5 ($ Millions)​
​TSR ($)​​Peer Group TSR ($)​
​2026​​28,349,672​​713,540,125​​6,279,618​​57,397,501​​543.42​​315.48​​787​​1,744.7​
​2025​​3,722,935​​34,479,371​​12,058,072​​10,843,278​​122.90​​111.71​​30​​1,318.6​
​2024​​101,497,009​​108,396,274​​2,455,433​​5,025,954​​99.82​​94.96​​( 159 )​​1,001.2​
​2023​​—​​—​​5,304,906​​6,787,965​​70.23​​89.84​​( 259 )​​1,238.7​
​2022​​—​​—​​2,670,549​​( 77,480 )​​70.19​​76.48​​235​​864.8​

​

1.

James R. Anderson was our PEO from June 3, 2024 through June 30, 2024 and to the present date (PEO 1). The individuals comprising the Non-PEO NEOs for each year presented are listed below.

​

Verbatim excerpt (356 words), formatting simplified. View full filing on EDGAR →
Atlassian Corp (TEAM) · Form DEF 14A for period ended 2026-10-14 · filed 2026-10-14 · Section: Clawback Policy

Atlassian adopted a Compensation Recovery Policy (the “Clawback Policy”) that meets the requirements of SEC and Nasdaq rules. The Clawback Policy applies to our Section 16 officers and requires the return of any erroneously awarded “Incentive Compensation” (as defined in the Clawback Policy) that was received during the three completed fiscal years preceding the date that the Board or a committee of the Board concludes, or reasonably should have concluded, that Atlassian is required to restate its financial statements, or if earlier, the date on which a court, regulator or other legally authorized body directs Atlassian to make such a restatement. Atlassian will seek to recover any additional amount of compensation actually paid over the amount that would have been paid following recalculation based on the restated financial statements.

The foregoing summary of our Clawback Policy does not purport to be complete and is qualified by reference to our Clawback Policy, which can be found as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2026.

Tax and Accounting Considerations

As a general matter, the CLDC reviews and considers the various tax and accounting implications of the compensation programs we utilize.

Verbatim excerpt (198 words), formatting simplified. View full filing on EDGAR →
YUM BRANDS INC (YUM) · Form DEF 14A for period ended 2026-05-14 · filed 2026-04-03 · Section: PA Y Ver sus Performance Disclosure

As required by Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship between executive compensation actually paid (as defined by SEC rules) and certain financial performance of the Company. The Management Planning and Development Committee did not consider the pay versus performance disclosure when making its incentive compensation decisions. For further information about how we align executive compensation with the company’s performance, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” on page 36 above. The amounts in the table below are calculated in accordance with SEC rules and do not represent amounts actually earned or realized by NEOs, including with respect to SARs, RSUs and PSUs. See the “2025 Option Exercises and Stock Vested” table on page 64 for more information.

The following table sets forth additional compensation information of our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and our non-CEO NEOs along with total shareholder return, net income, and Core Operating Profit Growth performance results for 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025.

Verbatim excerpt (175 words), formatting simplified. View full filing on EDGAR →
Ares Management Corp (ARES, ARES-PB) · Form DEF 14A for period ended 2025-12-31 · filed 2026-04-21 · Section: Pay Versus Performance

Act”) and Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship between executive compensation actually paid (as defined by SEC rules) and certain financial performance of the Company. For more information about our executive compensation program, please refer to the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section above.

YearSummary Compensation Table Total for PEO (1)Compensation Actually Paid to PEO (2)Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs (3)Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs (4)Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based On:Net Income (7)Fee Related Earnings (8)
Total Shareholder Return (5)Peer Group Total Shareholder Return (6)
($)($)($)($)($)($)($ in thousands)($ in thousands)
202568,279,53252,496,78230,236,61926,002,098399196426,1131,775,300
202485,381,842191,398,09227,567,77354,638,780425187440,9611,361,737
202330,576,59082,658,84014,837,09125,794,195278135474,3261,163,741
202234,601,10037,288,43913,511,35513,746,133155110167,541994,350
202170,842,896135,601,18123,162,85425,070,250178141386,748712,308

(1) The dollar amounts reported in this column are the amounts of total compensation reported for our Chief Executive Officer (the “PEO”) for each corresponding year, as reported in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table. The name of the PEO of the Company reflected in these columns for each of the applicable fiscal years is Michael J Arougheti .

(2) “Compensation Actually Paid to PEO” has been calculated in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v)(2)(iii) of Regulation S-K and does not reflect compensation actually earned, realized or received. When calculating “Compensation Actually Paid to PEO”, the following adjustments were made to the amounts reported for Mr. Arougheti in the Summary Compensation Table. In calculating “Compensation Actually Paid”, the fair value or change in fair value, as applicable, of the equity award adjustments included in each such calculation was computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Importantly, the dollar amounts do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid to Mr. Arougheti during the applicable year. “Compensation Actually Paid” for Mr. Arougheti includes performance equity awards with market conditions that have fully vested during the periods presented. Those performance equity awards with market conditions are presented as if the market conditions were met on the respective grant dates, with corresponding changes in fair value between the grant dates and vesting dates included within “Compensation Actually Paid to PEO.”

Verbatim excerpt (398 words), formatting simplified. View full filing on EDGAR →
Free weekly digest

New SEC comment letters by topic, notable staff comments, fresh disclosure examples and effective-date reminders. One email a week.

Templates & resources

Listed alphabetically by provider. Listings are not endorsements; no provider pays for placement. All templates & resources