Retail & Restaurants › Disclosure examples
Retail & Restaurants: Pay versus performance
Verbatim excerpt (183 words), formatting simplified. View full filing on EDGAR →As required by Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, this section describes the relationship between compensation actually paid and certain financial performance measures of the Company. For information about the philosophy, objectives and criteria of executive pay as they pertain to the Company's performance, refer to the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section.
Year Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO($) 1 Summary Compensation Table Total for Former PEO($) 1 Compensation Actually Paid to PEO($) 1,2 Compensation Actually Paid to Former PEO($) 1,2 Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs($) 1 Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs($) 1,2 Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based On: Net Income($) 5 (in millions) Net Sales Adjusted for Changes in Foreign Currencies ($) 6 (in millions) TSR($) 3 Peer Group TSR($) 4 2025 13,932,597 — 15,633,675 — 6,250,431 6,854,360 293.59 173.48 8,099 271,855 2024 12,229,741 16,049,870 18,702,319 29,445,370 8,381,978 11,133,897 276.32 154.78 7,367 250,099 2023 — 16,870,623 — 18,733,773 6,304,715 6,926,922 163.78 129.00 6,292 241,194 2022 — 9,905,070 — 11,868,875 5,806,023 6,353,825 158.84 128.26 5,844 224,492 2021 — 8,804,752 — 10,342,108 4,724,776 5,794,960 133.65 184.84 5,007 189,293
Verbatim excerpt (320 words), formatting simplified. View full filing on EDGAR →As required by Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship between executive compensation actually paid and certain financial performance of the Company. As described in greater detail in “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” our executive compensation program reflects a variable pay-for-performance philosophy. We use grants of time-based RSUs, and have previously used stock
options to incentivize our NEOs to increase the value of our enterprise for our stockholders. We have further previously used PSUs to tie executive incentives to key metrics in the Company's operating plan and future success. For further information concerning the Company’s variable pay-for-performance philosophy and how the Company’s philosophy aligns executive compensation with the Company’s performance, refer to “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”
Year Summary Compensation Table Total for CEO (1) Compensation Actually Paid to CEO (2) Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-CEO NEOs (3) Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-CEO NEOs (4) Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based On: Net Income (in millions) (7) Adjusted EBITDA (8) Company Total Shareholder Return (5) Peer Group Total Shareholder Return (6) (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) 2025 8,382,555 110,136,005 7,372,987 94,899,087 176.18 150.08 1,895 2,237 2024 10,595,400 118,068,079 9,291,363 103,567,575 84.90 148.71 404 1,378 2023 6,454,661 38,123,022 5,694,360 32,914,702 22.10 109.75 150 339 2022 5,594,436 ( 10,103,013 ) 5,017,181 ( 8,193,813 ) 1.98 77.70 ( 2,894 ) ( 1,041 ) 2021 5,050,345 5,302,981 4,426,654 5,423,458 96.76 118.97 ( 287 ) 64 (1) Mr. Garcia was our Chief Executive Officer in all years presented. The dollar amounts reported in column (b) are the amounts of total compensation reported for Mr. Garcia for each corresponding year in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table (the “SCT”). Refer to “Executive Compensation – Executive Compensation Tables – Summary Compensation Table.”
Verbatim excerpt (175 words), formatting simplified. View full filing on EDGAR →As required by Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship between executive compensation actually paid (as defined by SEC rules) and certain financial performance of the Company. The Management Planning and Development Committee did not consider the pay versus performance disclosure when making its incentive compensation decisions. For further information about how we align executive compensation with the company’s performance, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” on page 36 above. The amounts in the table below are calculated in accordance with SEC rules and do not represent amounts actually earned or realized by NEOs, including with respect to SARs, RSUs and PSUs. See the “2025 Option Exercises and Stock Vested” table on page 64 for more information.
The following table sets forth additional compensation information of our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and our non-CEO NEOs along with total shareholder return, net income, and Core Operating Profit Growth performance results for 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025.
See all Pay versus performance examples →
Templates & resources
- AICPA & CIMA – SEC reporting resources (AICPA & CIMA · Professional body · Free / member)
- BDO Accounting, Reporting & Compliance Hub (ARCH) (BDO · Firm guide · Free)
- Deloitte DART – Roadmap Series (Deloitte · Firm guide · Free)
- Grant Thornton Insights (Grant Thornton · Firm guide · Free)
- KPMG Financial Reporting View (KPMG · Firm guide · Free)
- PwC Viewpoint (PwC · Firm guide · Free / paid)
- RSM Financial Reporting Resource Center (RSM · Firm guide · Free)
- SEC – EDGAR Full Text Search (SEC · Regulator · Free)