SRSEC Reporting Desk

Software & IT Services › Disclosure examples

Software & IT Services: Pay versus performance

Note: Item 402(v) pay-versus-performance disclosure (typically in the proxy statement).
Datadog, Inc. (DDOG) · Form DEF 14A for period ended 2026-06-15 · filed 2026-04-29 · Section: PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE

As required by Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship between the compensation actually paid to our Chief Executive Officer and our other named executive officers and certain aspects of our financial performance. Compensation actually paid was calculated for purposes of this disclosure in accordance with the applicable SEC rules and does not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid to our Chief Executive Officer or our other named executive officers during the applicable years. The compensation committee does not use compensation actually paid as a basis for making compensation decisions. For information concerning how and why our compensation committee arrived at specific compensation decisions for 2025, please refer to “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

Summary Compensation Table Total for CEO ($) (1)Compensation Actually Paid to CEO ($) (2)Average Summary Compensation Table Total for non-CEO NEOs ($) (3)Average Compensation Actually Paid to non-CEO NEOs ($) (4)Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based On:Net Income (Loss) ($ Millions) (7)Revenue ($ Millions) (8)
YearTotal Shareholder Return (5)Peer Group Total Shareholder Return (6)
202527,055,48250,088,03715,628,42927,836,881360388107.703,427
202419,842,55429,463,76916,774,71523,980,392378301183.752,684
202311,644,93433,077,63510,196,71325,279,01232122148.572,128
202211,249,243( 85,747,704 )11,665,984( 32,708,200 )195133( 50.16 )1,675
20218,632,636107,014,42910,849,30860,711,468471207( 20.75 )1,029

(1) Represents the total compensation reported for Mr. Pomel for each applicable year in the “Summary Compensation Table”.

(2) The following adjustments were made to Mr. Pomel’s total compensation for each applicable year to determine the compensation actually paid:

Verbatim excerpt (282 words), formatting simplified. View full filing on EDGAR →
Atlassian Corp (TEAM) · Form DEF 14A for period ended 2026-10-14 · filed 2026-10-14 · Section: Clawback Policy

Atlassian adopted a Compensation Recovery Policy (the “Clawback Policy”) that meets the requirements of SEC and Nasdaq rules. The Clawback Policy applies to our Section 16 officers and requires the return of any erroneously awarded “Incentive Compensation” (as defined in the Clawback Policy) that was received during the three completed fiscal years preceding the date that the Board or a committee of the Board concludes, or reasonably should have concluded, that Atlassian is required to restate its financial statements, or if earlier, the date on which a court, regulator or other legally authorized body directs Atlassian to make such a restatement. Atlassian will seek to recover any additional amount of compensation actually paid over the amount that would have been paid following recalculation based on the restated financial statements.

The foregoing summary of our Clawback Policy does not purport to be complete and is qualified by reference to our Clawback Policy, which can be found as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2026.

Tax and Accounting Considerations

As a general matter, the CLDC reviews and considers the various tax and accounting implications of the compensation programs we utilize.

Verbatim excerpt (198 words), formatting simplified. View full filing on EDGAR →

See all Pay versus performance examples →

Templates & resources

Listed alphabetically by provider. Listings are not endorsements; no provider pays for placement. All templates & resources